Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Pjohn's avatar

I feel like it's fair to want to maintain a distinction between "a genuine sport where competitors are honestly trying their best to win" and "a pretend sport purely for the purposes of titillation"?

I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with the latter, if that's what people want to do (and come to think of it I'm not convinced that JSA sumo is necessarily always the former..) but it does seem disingenuous to use historical examples of pretend-sport-for-sex-reasons as "examples" of women in sport.

The message comes across (I'm sure entirely unintentionally!) as "women can participate in this sport but only if it's totally sexualised"; it doesn't exactly encourage women who genuinely want to be serious athletes.

(And the hopefully-intended message, "women can participate in this sport as serious respected athletes", doesn't exactly seem historically accurate. The first female sumo wrestlers seem to have been all-but forced to wrestle to titillate the carpenter, and the remaining examples seem like a sort of sexualised stage show.)

It would be fantastic to have women be able to participate in genuine sumo wrestling as serious athletes *as well as* women being able to be sex symbols with names like "Big Boobs". The JSA's "no women" attitude and this article's "women did wrestle for sex reasons and that's basically the same thing" attitude both seem quite unhealthy, to me.

No posts

Ready for more?